IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v26y2026i2p344-351.html

Climate overshoot implications for local adaptation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Theokritoff
  • Quentin Lejeune
  • Hugo P. Costa
  • Khadija Irfan
  • Mariam Saleh Khan
  • Chahan M. Kropf
  • Helena Gonzales Lindberg
  • Inês Gomes Marques
  • Inga Menke
  • Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
  • Adelle Thomas
  • Tiago Capela Lourenço

Abstract

As global warming increases, the topic of overshoot, understood as the temporary exceedance of the 1.5°C limit of the Paris Agreement, is gaining prominence both in scientific and political spheres. However, overshoot and its implications for adaptation in the short – and long-term remain unexplored. In this Perspective, we reflect on the current use of global climate scenarios and local impact projections in science-based adaptation planning. The risks arising from overshoot scenarios in relation to the transgression of limits to adaptation and impact irreversibility are highlighted. We find that the prospects of potential long-term impact reversibility may have limited relevance in most adaptation decision-making contexts, indicating that it might be peak warming, rather than a long-term outcome, that determines adaptation needs and costs. While overshoot may not be relevant for short-term planning, it should be considered for long-term plans and policies, for example for infrastructure-based measures and for irreversible impacts such as sea-level rise. Key insights from adaptation practitioners in four diverse urban vulnerability contexts (Bodø, Lisbon, Nassau, Islamabad) are presented on how these risks are perceived and integrated (or not) into local planning and policy-making. We find that current adaptation planning must be extensively evaluated against a wider set of future global climate outcomes to incorporate risks of transgression of local limits to adaptation and overshoot. To this end, data gaps on adaptation limits and impact reversibility need to be filled and capacity building needs on climate scenarios, overshoot and related concepts for local adaptation practitioners should be addressed.The topic of overshoot has yet to become well-established and widely considered by the adaptation community.Overshoot scenarios unfold on long time horizons making them most relevant for long-term adaptation planning, such as infrastructure-based measures.A strengthened science-policy interface and capacity-building at the local level are needed to support the design of adaptation plans that remain effective in the long-term.Limits to adaptation and impact reversibility resulting from overshoot must be further researched to provide essential science-based inputs in forward-looking adaptation plans.Flexible designs of adaptation measures can be considered to allow the adjustment of the level of risk reduction/protection provided by the measures over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Theokritoff & Quentin Lejeune & Hugo P. Costa & Khadija Irfan & Mariam Saleh Khan & Chahan M. Kropf & Helena Gonzales Lindberg & Inês Gomes Marques & Inga Menke & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Ad, 2026. "Climate overshoot implications for local adaptation planning," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 344-351, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:344-351
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2502111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2025.2502111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2025.2502111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:344-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.