Author
Listed:
- Patrick Jürgens
- Markus Kaiser
- Charlotte Senkpiel
- Connor Thelen
- Christoph Kost
- Hans-Martin Henning
Abstract
To limit global warming to 1.5$^{\circ }$∘C, rapid and significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are essential. However, there is a lack of analyses considering transition pathways using sector-coupled energy system models that limit national emissions to a 1.5$^{\circ }$∘C per capita carbon budget. This paper uses the REMod energy system model to derive a possible transition pathway within this budget. The model results show that immediate action in all aspects of the energy system is required, together with fundamental changes in energy policy and society, in order to stay within the remaining carbon budget. A crisis response that induces substantial and immediate demand reduction through societal behaviour change is essential. Furthermore, annual capacity additions of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar need to increase at rates four to seven times higher than historical maxima and the direct electrification of all sectors should be accelerated by replacing technologies even before they reach the end of their life (e.g. gas boilers and internal combustion engine vehicles).To close the ambition gap and comply with a 1.5$^{\circ }$∘C carbon budget, a strong and immediate crisis reaction is needed.The reduction of energy demand by leveraging behavioural change is key to sharply cut emissions.Besides the unconventionally fast deployment of new technologies, the accelerated phase-out of existing fossil-based technologies in all sectors needs to be addressed.Delaying the transition or an intensifying urgency to reduce emissions due to increasing impacts of the climate crisis might lead to similar scenarios where a strong and immediate crisis reaction is needed to sufficiently cut emissions.
Suggested Citation
Patrick Jürgens & Markus Kaiser & Charlotte Senkpiel & Connor Thelen & Christoph Kost & Hans-Martin Henning, 2026.
"Closing the ambition gap: Germany's energy transition in line with a 1.5ˆC carbon budget,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 314-331, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:314-331
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2506610
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:314-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.