Author
Abstract
Achieving the nationally determined contributions pledged by countries is critical to successfully achieving common climate policy goals. Green budgeting can be more qualitatively aligned with nationally determined contributions through efforts to manage the indirect and unintended impacts of the total budget on national emissions, along with efforts to quantitatively measure the direct and intended impacts of individual budget projects. Policy makers can use a framework based on the Component-Oriented Stochastic Impact by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology methodology as a top-down monitoring tool to see the net effect of fiscal spending on national emissions. Also, a framework based on modern portfolio theory can be utilized to construct an optimal industrial portfolio under different policy constraints (economic growth, economic stability, and emissions reduction). This approach makes it possible to adjust fiscal spending in a way that balances emission reduction targets with other policy objectives, thereby facilitating the transition of the industrial structure to a carbon-neutral form and ultimately contributing to achieving the nationally determined contribution.Green budgeting can be more qualitatively aligned with nationally determined contributions through efforts to manage the indirect and unintended impacts of the total budget on national emissions, along with the direct and intended impacts of individual budget projects.Unintentionally induced emissions from fiscal spending can account for a significant portion of a country's emissions, so monitoring the overall impact of fiscal spending on national emissions is necessary to achieve nationally determined contributions.If an industry's direct emissions are not significant, but its indirect emissions may be large due to its correlation with other high-emitting industries, this could be considered when deciding on budgetary expenditures to support that industry.
Suggested Citation
Ick Jin, 2026.
"Aligning green budgeting with nationally determined contributions,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 286-299, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:286-299
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2502108
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:286-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.