Author
Abstract
The Paris Agreement’s pledge and review process was designed to ramp up climate ambition through norm-setting and repeated interactions. Yet this peer influence dynamic remains underexplored in analyses of the determinants of climate ambition. To address this gap, this paper examines whether the climate ambition of peer countries can explain climate ambition in subsequent rounds of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). This paper builds on and contributes to research on the Paris Agreement, the drivers of climate ambition, and the broader literature on soft governance. Using spatial regression models, the analysis incorporates peer pressure into spatial lags of first-round NDC ambition to assess patterns of convergence and divergence in the second round of NDCs. The results show that climate ambition for peer groups with high geopolitical affinity, similar levels of democracy, and regional similarity converges, while countries with similar income levels exhibit diverging ambition trends. These results underscore the interdependent nature of climate ambition and suggest that leveraging peer networks could enhance global climate cooperation under the Paris Agreement.Although NDC formulation is a national matter, climate ambition is found to be interdependent across countries. It is therefore relevant to take this interdependence into account, yet this has thus far been underexplored.There is no peer relationship between multilateral interaction or participation in UNFCCC negotiation groups with climate ambition. It can therefore be helpful to strengthen or reconfigure the participatory regime surrounding the Paris Agreement to promote climate ambition among peers.Climate ambition is found to converge among peer countries based on democracy levels, regional location, and voting patterns in the United Nations General Assembly. Starting new or strengthening ongoing cooperation initiatives among these peer groups may be beneficial for raising climate ambition.
Suggested Citation
Hermine Van Coppenolle, 2026.
"The Power of Peers: a spatial analysis of nationally determined contributions,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 212-225, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:212-225
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2489738
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:212-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.