Author
Listed:
- Elisabeth Gilmore
- Travis St.Clair
Abstract
State governments in the United States offer a wide range of tax incentives to encourage the use of green technologies and support the energy transition away from fossil fuels. These tax incentives offer a politically palatable middle ground that subsidizes more environmentally friendly policies while also giving the appearance of reducing taxes. In this paper, we evaluate the extent of climate-related tax expenditures (i.e. the amount of foregone revenue from tax preferences) at the state level by collecting data from U.S. state budget documents and classifying and comparing the different types of tax expenditures across various dimensions. Our analysis yields three key findings: (1) ‘climate-friendly’ tax expenditures at the state level account for only about 0.1% of aggregate state tax collections and are negligible relative to federal incentives historically, (2) energy subsidies make up more than half of the incentives in dollar terms, and (3) both climate and fossil fuel subsidies exhibit substantial longevity due to the infrequency with which governments revisit or re-evaluate them. While these results suggest that there may be opportunities to better utilize tax incentives for climate policy, tax expenditures must be integrated more strategically into the broader landscape of budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals.State-level tax incentives that target climate change are small relative to state budgets.State-level incentives are primarily aimed at the energy and transportation sectors.State climate incentives often persist in the tax code, as do fossil fuel subsidies.Updating and utilizing tax incentives to advance climate policy may be a politically advantageous way of overcoming political partisanship.Climate incentives need to be more broadly integrated into budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals.
Suggested Citation
Elisabeth Gilmore & Travis St.Clair, 2026.
"Tax expenditures as tools for state-level climate action in the U.S,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 65-76, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:65-76
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2482111
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:65-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.