IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v25y2025i9p1428-1441.html

Translating global emission reduction goals into built environment policy instruments: an ambitious yet inadequate policy portfolio for Victoria, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Hurlimann
  • Geoffrey R. Browne
  • Alan March
  • Sareh Moosavi
  • Judy Bush

Abstract

This paper addresses the necessity to translate global emissions reduction goals into the complex policy portfolios governing built environments. Currently, global actions are not on track to achieve the Paris Agreement goal to limit warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The built environment is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and further action is needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions attributable to it. This paper develops an assessment mechanism to scrutinize the adequacy of built environment policy instruments’ emission reduction targets (mitigation targets) to address global emission reduction goals, and global climate justice. The mechanism is applied to 96 policy instruments in the built environment policy portfolio for the state of Victoria, and the City of Melbourne, Australia, and their broader federal and international contexts. The research finds that for some policy instruments, there is ambition that is consistent with global mitigation goals (the Paris Agreement). However, there is inadequate penetration of emission reduction targets across the broader instrument mix in the built environment policy portfolio. Additionally, the policy portfolio does not address international climate justice (i.e. allocate the remaining carbon budget in accordance with historical responsibility). These gaps risk not achieving global emissions reduction goals for the built environment. The assessment mechanism and method of policy analysis can be used in other jurisdictions to assess and reform existing policy instruments and portfolios, and to guide the development of new policy instruments, in order to facilitate necessary emissions reduction.There is inadequate coverage of greenhouse gas emission reduction targets across the policy portfolio.At the time of the review, an emission reduction target was absent in key policy instruments such as urban planning legislation and construction sector regulation.Holistic translation of emission reduction targets across a policy portfolio is important for achieving global goals.Establishment of a body responsible for oversight of the whole portfolio would be beneficial.The assessment mechanism and method could be used to assess the adequacy of other built environment policy portfolios, and to design new policy instrument and policy portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Hurlimann & Geoffrey R. Browne & Alan March & Sareh Moosavi & Judy Bush, 2025. "Translating global emission reduction goals into built environment policy instruments: an ambitious yet inadequate policy portfolio for Victoria, Australia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1428-1441, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-1441
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2459319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2025.2459319
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2025.2459319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-1441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.