Author
Abstract
The buildings sector’s energy demand and CO2 emissions are rising despite various energy standards and carbon disclosure initiatives. Drawing from the author’s experience as the former buildings sector lead at the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), this paper investigates the suitability of the initiative’s methodology and workflow for decarbonizing the sector. The paper demonstrates the incompatibility of current emissions accounting principles with the buildings sector and how this allowed companies to ‘artificially’ achieve emissions-reduction targets without tangibly improving the environmental performance of buildings. Given the sector’s limited share of renewable energy, the paper critiques the initiative’s disregard of buildings energy demand and questions how ‘science-based’ its interpretation of Net-Zero is. The paper introduces an alternative proposal whereby energy efficiency targets for buildings are derived from that share and, to be 1.5°C-aligned, companies within the sector must demonstrate that buildings they own, finance, or design comply with these targets.The uncritical application of emissions accounting principles to the buildings sector allows real estate companies to ‘artificially’ achieve their emissions-reduction targets through buying and selling properties.Without reducing the growing energy demand of the buildings sector, it is unlikely that the entirety of that demand could be supplied by the sector’s share of renewable energy, and thus a portion of it must be supplied through fossil fuels.This impedes the realization of a truly Net-Zero buildings sector and questions the extent to which the foundational principles of SBTi can be termed ‘science-based’.SBTi should develop energy efficiency targets for buildings that are derived from the sector’s share of renewable energy. To be 1.5°C-aligned, companies must demonstrate that the buildings they own, finance, or design comply with these targets.
Suggested Citation
Bashar Al Shawa, 2025.
"The incoherence of emissions accounting principles and Net-Zero targets in the buildings sector,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 1281-1292, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1281-1292
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2446521
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1281-1292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.