IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v25y2025i8p1144-1159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The vertical policy harmonization indices: assessing the gap between climate mitigation pledges and policies

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Baker
  • Marlene Kammerer
  • Paula Castro
  • Karin Ingold

Abstract

The effectiveness of the Paris Agreement in achieving its global temperature goal relies on countries adopting ambitious mitigation targets and introducing corresponding measures. But do countries adopt such corresponding climate policies? This paper introduces two Vertical Policy Harmonization Indices, which quantify the gap between a country’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) mitigation pledge and its national mitigation policies. These indices incorporate three dimensions of climate policymaking: emission reduction targets, the sectors covered by those targets, and the policy instruments introduced to reduce emissions. By focusing on policy instruments and mixes, we adopt a novel public policy approach for the harmonization assessment. While the Target Index compares the level and scope of reduction targets in the NDCs and national policies of 105 countries, covering approximately 91% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the Policy Effort Index also incorporates a comprehensive evaluation of the policy mix of selected countries. With the Policy Effort Index, we investigate 37 countries, covering over 70% of global GHG emissions. The indices show that three-quarters of the 105 countries have so far failed to translate their NDC targets into national policy. The remaining quarter has harmonized or even more ambitious national policies. Furthermore, countries show the most complete national policy mix in their most GHG-intensive sector, usually the energy sector. These insights demonstrate the indices’ potential for enabling future research explaining the deviations between countries’ domestic actions and their international pledges and evaluating the effectiveness of the progression mechanism as countries update their NDCs.Twenty-six of the 105 countries have national policies with GHG reduction targets either in line with or more ambitious than their NDC target.Seventy-nine countries (accounting for 50% of global emissions) have failed to translate their NDC target into a national policy.Countries tend to have their most balanced and intense policy mix in their largest emitting sector, which often is the energy sector.The coerciveness of policy instruments and the likelihood of their implementation remains low across sectors.EU membership, and development status appear to be indicative of the gap between climate mitigation pledges and policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Baker & Marlene Kammerer & Paula Castro & Karin Ingold, 2025. "The vertical policy harmonization indices: assessing the gap between climate mitigation pledges and policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 1144-1159, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1144-1159
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2443482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2443482
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2024.2443482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1144-1159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.