IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v25y2025i7p1044-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating climate-resilience: co-benefits and costs of a net zero development pathway in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Abiyot Dagne
  • Jan Corfee-Morlot
  • Andrea M. Bassi
  • Cynthia Elliott
  • Georg Pallaske
  • Marco Guzzetti
  • Nadin Medellin
  • Iryna Payosova
  • Mikayla Pellerin

Abstract

This paper examines the co-benefits of a pathway to net zero emissions (NZE) in Ethiopia focusing on the economic, social and environmental impacts of climate change mitigation and adaption. Using a novel, participatory, systems dynamics modeling approach – the Ethiopia Green Economy Model (GEM) – the authors assess a NZE pathway against a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario to 2050. Assumptions, design of the model, and features of the pathways were gathered through a collaborative initiative, working with representatives of the government of Ethiopia and local experts. The assessment compares the costs of implementing BAU versus NZE development pathways to the co-benefits of climate action. A key policy question is: how will climate action impact growth and investment as well as poverty, income inequality, employment, and ecosystem services? This analysis shows that moving onto a NZE pathway could raise Ethiopia’s GDP growth to 8.1 percent compared to 6.7 percent per year under BAU from 2020 to 2050. Implementation of NZE is estimated to raise cumulative investment costs as well compared to BAU by 2050 but yields significantly more in co-benefits and avoided costs combined, with the latter mainly from energy savings. Economic performance under the NZE pathway will bring about economic structural change, with a decline in agricultural GDP offset by growth in industry and the service sector. Beyond economic growth, a NZE pathway is expected to create employment co-benefits, adding green jobs, while also bringing about faster reduction of extreme and moderate poverty and raising average disposable income. Overall, this broad economy-wide analysis shows a benefit to cost ratio (BCR) greater than 1 by 2030, with $1.04 of benefits generated for every dollar invested, rising to nearly triple this by 2050. Implementation challenges include the need for a dedicated financing strategy and complementary policies to ensure a just transition for unskilled workers; not examined in any detail here, these are topics ripe for future work.Investments in climate mitigation and adaptation in Ethiopia can synergize development along a 2050 NZE pathway, delivering net zero GHG emissions as well as tangible co-benefits across economic, social and environmental outcomes.Higher levels of investment in the NZE scenario leads to faster, more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to BAU in the longer term.Early introduction of NZE actions and policies in land use and forestry, and in energy and transport sectors, improve development outcomes but also present trade-offs, between skilled and unskilled workers for example, for a just transition that require complementary policy effort.Delay in shifting to a NZE pathway risks hindering economic progress and poverty reduction in a future increasing shaped by climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiyot Dagne & Jan Corfee-Morlot & Andrea M. Bassi & Cynthia Elliott & Georg Pallaske & Marco Guzzetti & Nadin Medellin & Iryna Payosova & Mikayla Pellerin, 2025. "Navigating climate-resilience: co-benefits and costs of a net zero development pathway in Ethiopia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1044-1060, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:7:p:1044-1060
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2438300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2438300
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2024.2438300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:7:p:1044-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.