IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v25y2025i6p837-851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do impoverished regions benefit from climate change mitigation measures? Evidence from the Forest Carbon Sink Project in China

Author

Listed:
  • Di Fan
  • Manyi Zhao
  • Ke Wang

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in achieving global climate change mitigation goals. The Forest Carbon Sink Project (FCSP) was initially proposed by the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol, aiming to address externalities in climate governance through ecological compensation mechanisms. For impoverished regions, the FCSP is more attractive than the mandatory administrative approaches to forest protection. This Currently, due to the lack of empirical research, there is still debate in the academic community about whether the FCSP can produce overall positive economic benefits in poor areas. Based on panel data from 634 impoverished counties in China from 2002 to 2019, this study attempts to address this issue using a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model. The results demonstrate that, compared to non project counties, the implementation of the FCSP led to an increase in actual GDP and per capita GDP of 8.40% and 11.10% in project counties, respectively. That is, the FCSP can expand the economic scale while also promoting economic growth of project counties. The results of the dynamic model show that the economic benefits generated by the FCSP in these counties are long-term and sustainable. Based on the results of theoretical analysis and mechanism testing models, this study concludes that the FCSP generates short-term economic benefits through capital investment. It generates long-term economic benefits by improving the productivity of the primary industry labour force, increasing the level of fixed asset construction, and optimizing the industrial structure in poverty-stricken counties. Additionally, this study also conducted a heterogeneity analysis. In summary, this study concludes that the FCSP is a climate change mitigation measure worthy of promotion in impoverished regions.Implementing the Forest Carbon Sink Project (FCSP) in China's poverty-stricken counties can expand the economic scale and promote economic growth.Impoverished regions could enhance labour productivity, promote fixed asset investment, and optimize industrial structure by participating in the FCSP.In China, the FCSP from the international voluntary carbon offset market yields superior economic benefits compared to those from the international mandatory carbon offset market.Drawing from China's experience, other developing countries could consider prioritizing participation in the FCSP from the international voluntary carbon offset market or establishing their own domestic carbon offset markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Fan & Manyi Zhao & Ke Wang, 2025. "Do impoverished regions benefit from climate change mitigation measures? Evidence from the Forest Carbon Sink Project in China," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 837-851, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:6:p:837-851
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2418947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2418947
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2024.2418947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:6:p:837-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.