IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v25y2025i4p513-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate action or delay: the dynamics of competing narratives in the UK political sphere and the influence of climate protest

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Nisbett
  • Viktoria Spaiser
  • Cristina Leston-Bandeira
  • Daniel Valdenegro

Abstract

It is often argued that political will is needed to make progress on responding to the climate crisis. Political will needs a narrative though, substantiating why political intervention is needed. This paper examines the dynamics of key competing climate policy narratives in the political sphere – normative, i.e. morally underpinned pro-climate action, denial and delay of climate action and other, mostly exclusively economic or technical arguments for climate action – using data of parliamentary debates in the UK between 2017 and 2022 and interviews with politicians and civil servants for complementary computational, time-series and qualitative analyses. We investigate the role played by major external events, focussing on pro-action climate protests, in shaping these competing dynamics, which ultimately underpin climate policy decisions. We find an increase in normative pro-climate arguments used in parliament in 2018/2019 during major climate protests, which become the dominant argument line. And while this increase slowed down during the COVID-19 pandemic, it nevertheless consolidated, reinvigorated by COP26 in Glasgow in 2021, which was also accompanied by resumed climate protests. Analysis suggests moreover that the normative pro-climate action and the denial/delay narratives are coupled. We also find considerable differences between the two major UK parties. The governing Conservatives are split between the pro-climate action and delay/denial camps, paralysing any policy progress, with latest dynamics suggesting delay arguments becoming more dominant. Labour, on the other hand, embraces the normative pro-climate action narrative, though even here delay arguments are occasionally employed. Our interviews with politicians and civil servants confirm our computational analysis that suggests there was a shift in 2018/2019 with an increase of normative pro-climate action narrative. They confirm that flagship UK climate policies, such as the net zero by 2050 legislation passed in June 2019 and Labour’s Green New Deal launch in March 2019, were aided by climate protests.Climate movements can affect a shift in climate policies through increasing political salience of climate change and changing the frames used to negotiate climate policies.Climate movements should take note of the competing denial/delay narrative, which is coupled with the normative pro-climate narrative and can paralyse progress in climate policy.While political parties on the left/centre-left, like Labour in the UK, are more amenable to the climate movement narrative, they are not entirely resistant to the denial/delay narrative.Politicians from centre-right who are amenable to the climate movement narrative face greater opposition inside their parties where denial/delay positions are relatively strong.Climate protest can successfully establish a political mandate for climate action, the next step must be to mobilize the public for radical climate policies that would require also lifestyle changes and to fight back backlash.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Nisbett & Viktoria Spaiser & Cristina Leston-Bandeira & Daniel Valdenegro, 2025. "Climate action or delay: the dynamics of competing narratives in the UK political sphere and the influence of climate protest," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 513-526, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:4:p:513-526
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2398169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2398169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2024.2398169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:4:p:513-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.