Author
Listed:
- Addisu Lashitew
- Youqing Mu
Abstract
Extensive research shows that corporations tacitly resist climate change-related regulations even as they publicly espouse pro-climate strategies. In this study, we examine corporate responses to a major regulatory proposal by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to increase climate-related disclosures, which was made into law in March 2024. Corporate opposition to climate change disclosure regulation is measured by performing sentiment analysis, using GPT-3 from OpenAI, on comments and letters submitted by companies to the SEC on the proposed regulation. Analysis of data from 146 large corporations shows a positive average sentiment, indicating a statistically significant support for the proposed regulation. However, there are substantial variations across firms, with energy firms exhibiting the highest, and service firms the least, opposition. Opposition to climate change disclosure regulation was significantly greater in companies with higher Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions though no significant association was found for Scope 2 and 3 emissions. Companies with strong recent stock market performance, politically liberal boards, robust environmental disclosure practices, and sound sustainability governance were less opposed to the regulation. These results show that companies face mixed incentives that simultaneously increase the appeal and risk of climate change disclosures, reducing the efficacy of voluntary disclosure regimes.Key policy insights Sentiment analysis of letters submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission reveals notable heterogeneities in corporate opposition to climate change disclosure regulation.Energy and service firms exhibit the highest and the lowest level of opposition, respectively, to climate change disclosure regulation.Corporate opposition is significantly greater in companies with higher Scope 1 GHG emissions but significantly lower in companies with higher stock market performance.Companies with politically liberal boards, robust environmental disclosure practices, and sound sustainability governance are less opposed to climate change disclosure regulation.Companies face conflicting pressures that confound the efficacy of voluntary corporate climate change disclosures.
Suggested Citation
Addisu Lashitew & Youqing Mu, 2025.
"Corporate opposition to climate change disclosure regulation in the United States,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 422-437, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:422-437
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2394518
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:422-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.