IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v45y2026i5p932-948.html

Common ground improves learning with conversational agents

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Körner
  • Antonia Tolzin
  • Andreas Janson
  • Jan Marco Leimeister
  • Ralf Rummer

Abstract

Although conversational agents are successfully applied in teaching, it is largely unclear which communication principles should be employed to optimise learning. We examine the influence of common ground (i.e. shared knowledge on which to build during conversation) on learning. In an in-class experiment, students studied with one of two pedagogical conversational agents. The control version provided information without emphasising grounding, whereas the common ground version emphasised grounding, for example, by encouraging students to monitor and repair common ground. After the learning unit, students evaluated their learning experience and the pedagogical conversational agent, after which they were tested on the studied material. Students in the common ground (vs. the control) condition performed better in a post-study knowledge test and engaged longer with the pedagogical conversational agent. Thus, the common ground emphasis facilitated learning with a conversational agent, indicating that grounding principles should be incorporated when designing conversational agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Körner & Antonia Tolzin & Andreas Janson & Jan Marco Leimeister & Ralf Rummer, 2026. "Common ground improves learning with conversational agents," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 932-948, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:5:p:932-948
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2541222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2541222
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2541222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:5:p:932-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.