IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v45y2026i4p754-768.html

How scenery shapes virtual endorser effectiveness: the role of physical presence and pictorial distance

Author

Listed:
  • Chenhan Ruan
  • Di Chen
  • Xiaoyang Zhang
  • Wenhe Lin
  • Qiqi Hu
  • En-hao Chen

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence has introduced novel alternatives to traditional human endorsers, but how to boost the persuasiveness of virtual endorsers remains to be explored. The existing literature has predominantly focused on the inherent characteristics of virtual endorsers, yet overlooked the scenic construction in which these endorsers display products. Drawing on media richness theory, this research undertakes four experiments to demonstrate that virtual endorsers lead to lower purchase intention than real endorsers (Studies 1–4). Besides, this effect is attributed to a higher perceived risk triggered by lower information richness (Study 2). Further, the negative effect of virtual endorsers on purchase intention can be mitigated by physical presence (Study 3) and pictorial distance (Study 4). Specifically, when physical presence is high or pictorial distance is large, the perceived risk associated with virtual endorsers decreases, thereby enhancing purchase intention. This research enriches the human–computer interaction literature by incorporating scenic elements into display design and provides actional insights for brand promotion with virtual endorsers on social media platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenhan Ruan & Di Chen & Xiaoyang Zhang & Wenhe Lin & Qiqi Hu & En-hao Chen, 2026. "How scenery shapes virtual endorser effectiveness: the role of physical presence and pictorial distance," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 754-768, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:754-768
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2531398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2531398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2531398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:754-768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.