IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v45y2026i4p680-693.html

Can reflecting on smartphone screen time legitimacy increase college students’ study effort: a field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Fan
  • Bin Wang
  • Xuefang Xie
  • Jun Yang
  • Yue Zhang
  • Jing Qian

Abstract

Based on the introjected regulation perspective, this study developed a reflection intervention on smartphone screen time legitimacy, prompting college students to critically evaluate the legitimacy of their daily screen time on smartphones. We propose that this self-reflection intervention can influence students’ study efforts by increased shame and introjected study motivation. We examined our hypotheses using an experience sampling study of 118 college students across 14 consecutive days. In the daily morning survey, we randomly assigned participants to one of two conditions: reflecting on the legitimacy of their previous day’s smartphone screen time (i.e. experimental group) or recalling the most memorable events of the previous day (i.e. control group). Results from our multilevel analyses revealed that reflection intervention on smartphone screen time legitimacy (compared with the control group) can lead to greater shame, which in turn, enhanced introjected study motivation and daily study effort. Additionally, we found that general self-efficacy had a cross-level moderating effect on the within-individual relationship between reflection intervention and shame such that, the effect of reflection intervention on shame was more pronounced for students with higher levels of general self-efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Fan & Bin Wang & Xuefang Xie & Jun Yang & Yue Zhang & Jing Qian, 2026. "Can reflecting on smartphone screen time legitimacy increase college students’ study effort: a field experiment," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 680-693, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:680-693
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2528759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2528759
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2528759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:680-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.