IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v45y2026i2p314-331.html

A comparison of conversational chatbots and the internet for consumer information search

Author

Listed:
  • Wondwesen Tafesse
  • Yoseph Mamo

Abstract

This study compares consumer perceptions of conversational chatbots and the internet for information search. While the internet is a mature platform, conversational chatbots represent an emerging technology, and insight into how consumers view them in relation to the internet for information search is lacking. Drawing on the information source utility perspective, the study builds a comparative model based on four key dimensions: information currency, information customisation, information trustworthiness, and media richness. Additionally, the study investigates consumers’ prior experience with conversational chatbots as a moderating factor. Data was collected from 191 respondents recruited through MTurk. Paired sample t-tests assessed mean differences between the internet and conversational chatbots along the four dimensions of information source utility, while ANOVA assessed the effect of prior experience on the mean differences. The findings show that the internet is perceived as a superior platform across all four dimensions. Perceived gaps were wider for the information currency and media richness dimensions, but were narrower for the information customisation and information trustworthiness dimensions. Furthermore, consumers with greater prior chatbot experience perceived narrower gaps between the internet and conversational chatbots across all four dimensions than those with less experience. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wondwesen Tafesse & Yoseph Mamo, 2026. "A comparison of conversational chatbots and the internet for consumer information search," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 314-331, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:314-331
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:314-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.