IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v45y2026i2p280-298.html

Differences in attention networks between problematic and non-problematic smartphone users: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs)

Author

Listed:
  • Jiamin Ge
  • I-Jun Chen
  • Wenjing Cao
  • Tengyou Shu
  • Dan Peng
  • Anbang Zhang

Abstract

Previous research indicates that specific sub-networks within the attentional networks show abnormalities in individuals with problematic smartphone use. However, there has been insufficient exploration of the cognitive neurobiological mechanisms that underpin this phenomenon. We combined behavioural assessments with electrophysiological measures to address behavioural data limitations. Twenty-two individuals with problematic smartphone usage and twenty-two non-problematic smartphone users completed the behavioural data recording, while twenty-one individuals from each group completed the ERP data recording during the Attention Network Test (ANT). Behaviorally, the results indicated no difference in the three attention networks between the two groups. Electrophysiological data reveal that components associated with alerting and orienting (cue-N1) are similar between both groups, while differences are observed in components related to executive control (target-N2). These results suggest that individuals with problematic smartphone use may need to engage additional compensatory cognitive resources to achieve equivalent behavioural performance in executive control tasks compared to controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiamin Ge & I-Jun Chen & Wenjing Cao & Tengyou Shu & Dan Peng & Anbang Zhang, 2026. "Differences in attention networks between problematic and non-problematic smartphone users: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs)," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 280-298, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:280-298
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2517209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:280-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.