Author
Listed:
- Linxi Lei
- Yan Zhou
- Faren Huo
- Fei Fang
Abstract
Social information is widely used in pedestrian crossing, particularly in pedestrians’ conformity behaviour. With the increasing prevalence of automated vehicles, pedestrians adjust their behaviour to align with this change. This study investigates how automated vehicles (AVs) influence pedestrian crossing behaviour, focusing on social information and conformity in different crowd scenarios. Experiments compared pedestrian responses to AVs and manual vehicles across three crossing scenarios: solo-crossing (no pedestrians present), crowd-crossing (three pedestrians cross before the vehicle stops, one waits), and crowd-waiting (one pedestrian crosses before the vehicle stops, three wait). Volunteers provided objective response times and subjective assessments (trust, perceived safety, willingness to cross, and follow). Results showed crowd-crossing reduced response time, while crowd-waiting increased it. The interaction between vehicle and crowd types showed AVs led to lower willingness to cross in all conditions, with the lowest willingness observed in the crowd-waiting condition. Manual vehicles elicited higher trust and perceived safety than AVs. Crowd-crossing enhanced trust and safety, whereas crowd-waiting diminished them. Findings highlight that pedestrian group behaviour significantly influences interactions with AVs, affecting attitudes and perceived risks. These insights underscore the need for autonomous driving systems to consider group dynamics and effectively communicate vehicle intent.
Suggested Citation
Linxi Lei & Yan Zhou & Faren Huo & Fei Fang, 2026.
"The impact of automated vehicles on pedestrian conformity behavioural decisions,"
Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 181-196, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:181-196
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2513541
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:181-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.