IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i9p2053-2068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on relationship between adversarial texts and language errors: a human-computer interaction perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Xiao
  • Kuangyi Zhang
  • Yunchun Zhang
  • Qi Wang
  • Shangyu Hou
  • Ling Liu

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are widely applied in many human-computer interactive applications, such as chatbots. However, a deep understanding of the vulnerability of LLMs against adversarial attacks and language errors poses a threatening challenge. This study, therefore, presents a systematic analysis to disclose the relationships among language errors, adversarial texts, and LLMs. Each LLM is measured in language understanding ability and robustness within a human-computer interaction context. To further disclose the differences between language errors and adversarial texts, we measured each LLM under 6 metrics, including Levinstein edit distance, Modification rate, Cosine similarity, perplexity, error rate, and BLEU. Through detailed experiments, we first prove that both language error texts and adversarial texts have a serious impact on the performance of LLMs. The quantified measure of the difference between these two texts is innovative in differentiating language errors and adversarial texts from clean texts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Xiao & Kuangyi Zhang & Yunchun Zhang & Qi Wang & Shangyu Hou & Ling Liu, 2025. "Study on relationship between adversarial texts and language errors: a human-computer interaction perspective," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 2053-2068, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:9:p:2053-2068
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2396437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2396437
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2396437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:9:p:2053-2068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.