IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i9p1739-1759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cleaning house or quiet quitting? Large-scale analysis of account deletion behaviour on Tumblr

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Sarig
  • Ran Wolff
  • Eran Toch

Abstract

Disengagement from social media platforms encompasses various behaviours, such as reducing activity or abandoning them altogether. At the far end of this spectrum, permanently deleting user accounts holds substantial implications for individuals, the people they contact, and the platform itself. However, the motivations underlying this choice, which involves erasing all content and social connections rather than simply abandoning the platform, remain unclear. To address this research gap, we analysed 4.5 million active users on Tumblr, a microblogging service. We assessed the likelihood of users deleting their accounts using binary logistic regression in general and in specific clusters of users. Our findings reveal that users are more inclined to delete their accounts if they have previously removed content from their profiles, highlighting the role of account deletion in cleaning and controlling personal information. Additionally, we observed robust peer correlations, indicating that users are more likely to delete their accounts if those they follow have already taken this step. We discuss these findings in the context of non-use theories and propose the development of checking-out processes that can enhance the user experience associated with account deletion.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Sarig & Ran Wolff & Eran Toch, 2025. "Cleaning house or quiet quitting? Large-scale analysis of account deletion behaviour on Tumblr," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1739-1759, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:9:p:1739-1759
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2370432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2370432
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2370432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:9:p:1739-1759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.