IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i8p1557-1575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the causes of user frustration in the case of conversational chatbots

Author

Listed:
  • Sakhhi Chhabra
  • Vaishali Kaushal
  • Smitha Girija

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to transform many facets of our existence with the gradual penetration of the semantic web. One such AI-based technology is a chatbot that considerably alters numerous business verticals to enhance users and businesses. Even though companies are extensively contemplating using chatbots to supplement or even replace humans, users have exhibited anger, confusion, and customer dissatisfaction with chatbots. The current study aims to find the reasons for user frustration in the case of conversational chatbots and adopts exploratory research using a critical incident technique (CIT) survey. Results are analysed using sentiment analysis and topic modelling with Python. Results of the study indicate four significant causes of user frustration, i.e. poor semantic understanding, lack of customisation, lack of Humanisation of the bot, and poor competency. These causes have further been examined across various socio-demographic variables and industry contexts. This work would theoretically advance the bot literature and fulfil the gap by understanding the reasons for frustration. This would further help bot developers and marketers in designing and training chatbots that lead to better engagement and enhanced customer experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakhhi Chhabra & Vaishali Kaushal & Smitha Girija, 2025. "Determining the causes of user frustration in the case of conversational chatbots," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1557-1575, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:8:p:1557-1575
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2362956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2362956
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2362956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:8:p:1557-1575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.