IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i15p3621-3641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dimensionalised privacy behaviour model: an empirical test of a conceptual proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Epstein
  • Kelly Quinn

Abstract

Privacy research struggles with modelling how individuals value and enact privacy, and faces challenges in explaining apparent contradictions such as the privacy paradox and manifestations of privacy-related disempowerment. Such uncertainties arise from the use of unidimensional privacy constructs or through assumptions that privacy-related decisions are rational or intentional. Addressing these lacunae, we present and empirically test the Dimensionalised Privacy Behaviour (DPB) model, which simultaneously examines the relationships between privacy concerns and privacy-protecting behaviours (PPB) along privacy’s horizontal and vertical orientations, and introduces online privacy literacy and privacy self-efficacy as additional explanatory mechanisms in PPB modelling. Using data from a representative sample of 618 US social media users, we demonstrate that the privacy concerns/privacy behaviours dynamic is better understood along its vertically – and horizontally-oriented dimensions, and that each dimension interacts differently with explanatory elements. Furthermore, while affirming the established logic between privacy concerns and PPB, these results highlight privacy self-efficacy as a significant factor for explaining PPB, with differing effects in each dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Epstein & Kelly Quinn, 2025. "A dimensionalised privacy behaviour model: an empirical test of a conceptual proposition," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(15), pages 3621-3641, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:15:p:3621-3641
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2443523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2443523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2443523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:15:p:3621-3641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.