IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i10p2364-2378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conversational agent framework for mental health screening: design, implementation, and usability

Author

Listed:
  • Rares Boian
  • Ana-Maria Bucur
  • Diana Todea
  • Andreea Luca
  • Traian Rebedea
  • Ioana R. Podina

Abstract

While chatbots show promise for large-scale mental health screening, few offer interactive, free-text conversations, limiting their appeal for self-administered screening and impeding the timely detection of mental health issues. This study introduces an AI-based chatbot that allows users to respond to validated screening surveys for mental disorders (PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PCL-5) in a natural, free-text conversation manner with real-time feedback. The study's objectives include evaluating the chatbot's usability and reducing the frequency of response clarifications while accurately interpreting users’ responses. The system was assessed running in hybrid NLU mode (Phase 2; N = 587; Mage = 21.56, SD = 5.56, 67.8% women) after being trained on data collected while running in rule-based mode (Phase 1; N = 274; Mage = 21.86, SD = 5.50). During user-chatbot interactions, the chatbot required clarification only 4.64% of the time. Using the AI NLU model, the chatbot could understand user responses in 85.65% of cases and interpret free-text similarly to human annotators. In terms of usability, the chatbot in hybrid NLU mode was perceived as more engaging, friendly, and easier to use than in the rule-based NLU mode, which may be indirectly attributed to the enhanced autonomy provided by the AI NLU model.

Suggested Citation

  • Rares Boian & Ana-Maria Bucur & Diana Todea & Andreea Luca & Traian Rebedea & Ioana R. Podina, 2025. "A conversational agent framework for mental health screening: design, implementation, and usability," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 2364-2378, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:10:p:2364-2378
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2332934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2332934
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2332934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:10:p:2364-2378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.