IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v43y2024i5p929-942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in sense of community and participation between lurkers and posters in informal online education-related communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawen Zhu
  • Kara Dawson

Abstract

Lurking behaviour is very common in online communities, especially in large-scale informal online communities. Lurkers, who make up the majority of community members, are often overlooked by researchers. The aim of this investigation was to explore both lurkers and posters’ participation and sense of community in informal online education-related communities. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was applied. A total of 82 participants completed the survey and 9 of them were interviewed. Results of the investigation showed that although there was no significant difference between lurkers and posters in their sense of community, they reported different perceptions of community during the interviews. Lurkers tended to be more negative about the technical features supporting communities, while posters tended to be more negative about people who hindered community building through disrespectful or unkind contributions. In addition, while participation between those who post and those who lurk was different in the communities studied, interviews suggest that both lurkers and posters had different reasons for lurking and may change their participation behaviours depending on how they perceive the community within different online groups. Practical implication for online community mangers and educators in terms of reconsidering design and management and implications for future studies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawen Zhu & Kara Dawson, 2024. "Differences in sense of community and participation between lurkers and posters in informal online education-related communities," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 929-942, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:5:p:929-942
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196571
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:5:p:929-942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.