IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v43y2024i1p95-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does working memory capacity influence learning from video and attentional processing of the instructor’s visuals?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Wang

Abstract

Existing evidence suggested learners with differences in attention and cognition might respond to the same media in differential ways. The current study focused on one format of video design – instructor visibility and explored the moderating effects of working memory capacity on learning from such video design and if learners with high and low working memory capacity attended to the instructor’s visuals differently. Participants watched a video either with or without the instructor’s visuals on the screen, while their visual attention was recorded simultaneously. After the video, participants responded to a learning test that measured retention and transfer. Although the results did not show working memory capacity moderated the instructor visibility effects on learning or influenced learners’ visual attention to the instructor’s visuals, the findings did indicate working memory capacity was a positive predictor of retention performance regardless of the video design. Discussions and implications of the findings were provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Wang, 2024. "Does working memory capacity influence learning from video and attentional processing of the instructor’s visuals?," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 95-109, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:1:p:95-109
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2155574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2155574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2155574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:1:p:95-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.