IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v42y2023i11p1740-1757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media use in professional organizations: boosting and draining workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Reetta Oksa
  • Markus Kaakinen
  • Nina Savela
  • Noora Ellonen
  • Atte Oksanen

Abstract

Social media use in professional organisations can have several psychological and physiological consequences. The aim of this study was to examine how social media is used in five professional organisations from distinct occupational fields and how such use relates to job demands, job resources, and personal resources. We collected survey data (N = 563) to analyze professional social media use. We also conducted theory-driven content analysis utilising focus group interviews (N = 52). Based on the results, internal and external social media platforms were mainly used for content following and sharing as well as communication with work communities. Social media use was not identified very straining or conflicting with private life. Those using social media more often experienced more strain and conflict but also considered social media more useful. Social media use was associated with job demands, such as physiological symptoms, fears, social pressure, and unclear rules, as well as job resources, such as organisational encouragement and support, social networks, information, and autonomy, and the personal resource of personal identity development. Professional social media use is perceived more as a job resource than as a job demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Reetta Oksa & Markus Kaakinen & Nina Savela & Noora Ellonen & Atte Oksanen, 2023. "Social media use in professional organizations: boosting and draining workforce," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(11), pages 1740-1757, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:42:y:2023:i:11:p:1740-1757
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2094833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2094833
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2094833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:42:y:2023:i:11:p:1740-1757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.