IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v41y2022i15p3346-3359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring folk theories of algorithmic news curation for explainable design

Author

Listed:
  • Thao Ngo
  • Nicole Krämer

Abstract

Algorithmic news curation determines users’ news exposure in the online environment. Despite its usefulness, it also comes along with the problem of algorithmic opacity. To combat this, explainable algorithmic news curation systems are necessary. One user-centered solution to design these systems can be achieved through the systematic exploration of user folk theories. For this, we conducted twelve in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore (1) the user preferences for explainable system design, and (2) folk theories of algorithmic news curation. By applying qualitative content analysis, we found a psychological trade-off between the desire for transparency and feelings of creepiness, thus a preference for explanations to be hidden. Furthermore, we identified eight assumptions of folk theories. The results are compared to previous folk theories and discussed in terms of the ‘sweet spot’ of system transparency. We conclude that exploring folk theories is a key requirement for designing explainable algorithmic news curation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Thao Ngo & Nicole Krämer, 2022. "Exploring folk theories of algorithmic news curation for explainable design," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(15), pages 3346-3359, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:41:y:2022:i:15:p:3346-3359
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1987522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1987522
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1987522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:41:y:2022:i:15:p:3346-3359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.