IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v39y2020i11p1156-1175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deterrent effects of punishment and training on insider security threats: a field experiment on phishing attacks

Author

Listed:
  • Bora Kim
  • Do-Yeon Lee
  • Beomsoo Kim

Abstract

There is no doubt that organisational security threats are currently surging, internally and externally. In an effort to prevent internal threats – employee violations of information security policy (ISP) – security training programmes and sanction policies are implemented to a large extent in organisations. However, few studies have verified their practical effectiveness and the impact of individual characteristics within organisations. This study conducted a field experiment to examine the actual deterrent effect of those measures against phishing attacks. By fabricating fake phishing schemes through a simulation programme, the specific deterrent effect of punishment, the general deterrent effect of education, and employees’ organisational position were tested on their ISP compliance behaviour. Findings confirmed that punishment effectively prevented the punished from falling for phishing again and that the trained group fell for phishing much less often than the untrained group. In addition, the higher one’s organisational position, the more likely the person fell for phishing. Regardless of the treatment (i.e. training or punishment), this position effect stood out. The results of this study offer researchers and practitioners insightful information about effective deterrence measures and policies for organisational information security.

Suggested Citation

  • Bora Kim & Do-Yeon Lee & Beomsoo Kim, 2020. "Deterrent effects of punishment and training on insider security threats: a field experiment on phishing attacks," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 1156-1175, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:11:p:1156-1175
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1653992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1653992
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1653992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:11:p:1156-1175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.