IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v38y2019i3p217-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How perceptions of incivility and social endorsement in online comments (Dis) encourage engagements

Author

Listed:
  • Ji won Kim
  • Sungyoung Park

Abstract

While the powerful role of partisan identity in provoking incivility has been pointed out, relatively little attention has been directed toward incivility that also occurs among individuals who share the same partisan identity. Two experiments examined how uncivil expressions made by in-group members with aligned partisanship as well as uncivil expressions made by out-group members with opposing partisanship led to perceptual, attitudinal, and behavioural intentions. Also examined are how the effects of uncivil comments are influenced by social endorsements, such as the ‘recommend’ feature. Results indicate that incivility, group identity, and the presence of social recommendations shape individuals’ perceived polarisation that, in turn, influences open-mindedness to (dis) encourage engagement during discussions. Overall, findings of this study provide a mechanism for explaining how incivility works with static factors, such as group identity, and situational factors, such as social recommendations that influence our perceptions, attitudes, and behavioural intentions to be engaged in online discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji won Kim & Sungyoung Park, 2019. "How perceptions of incivility and social endorsement in online comments (Dis) encourage engagements," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 217-229, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:3:p:217-229
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1523464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1523464
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1523464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:3:p:217-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.