IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v37y2018i8p761-773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sixth graders’ evaluation strategies when reading Internet search results: an eye-tracking study

Author

Listed:
  • Jarkko Hautala
  • Carita Kiili
  • Yvonne Kammerer
  • Otto Loberg
  • Sanna Hokkanen
  • Paavo H. T. Leppänen

Abstract

Eye-tracking technology was used to examine Internet search result evaluation strategies adopted by sixth-grade students (N = 36) during ten experimental information search tasks. The relevancy of the search result’s title, URL, and snippet components was manipulated and selection of search results as well as looking into probabilities on the search result components was analysed. The results revealed that during first-pass inspection, students read the search engine page by first looking at the title of a search result. If the title was relevant, the probability of looking at the snippet of the search result increased. During second-pass inspection, there was a high probability of students focusing on the most promising search result by inspecting all of its components before making their selection. A cluster analysis revealed three viewing strategies: half of the students looked mainly at the titles and snippets; one-third with high probability examined all components; and one-sixth mainly focused on titles, leading to more frequent errors in search result selection. The results indicate that students generally made a flexible use of both eliminative and confirmatory evaluation strategies when reading Internet search results, while some seemed to not pay attention to snippet and URL components of the search results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarkko Hautala & Carita Kiili & Yvonne Kammerer & Otto Loberg & Sanna Hokkanen & Paavo H. T. Leppänen, 2018. "Sixth graders’ evaluation strategies when reading Internet search results: an eye-tracking study," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 761-773, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:8:p:761-773
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1477992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1477992
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1477992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:8:p:761-773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.