IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v37y2018i1p16-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saving face on Facebook: privacy concerns, social benefits, and impression management

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey G. Proudfoot
  • David Wilson
  • Joseph S. Valacich
  • Michael D. Byrd

Abstract

The nearly ubiquitous use of online social networks generally entails substantial personal disclosure and elicits significant privacy concerns. This research uses Social Exchange Theory and the impression management (IM) literature to examine how privacy concerns can be counterbalanced by the perceived social benefits afforded by a social network’s ability to support IM. We frame social network use as an attempt to engage in IM, and we highlight the importance of a social network’s IM affordances in predicting social benefits from, and disclosure through, a social network. We test our model with a sample of 244 Facebook users, finding support for the proposed relationships and yielding the following contributions. First, this research provides a novel positioning of perceived IM affordances as a primary driver of both perceived social benefits and IM disclosure propensity. Second, this research illuminates that trust in both the social network provider and social network peers influences privacy concerns, social benefits, and perceived IM affordances. Our theory has important implications for researchers and practitioners interested in privacy issues within social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey G. Proudfoot & David Wilson & Joseph S. Valacich & Michael D. Byrd, 2018. "Saving face on Facebook: privacy concerns, social benefits, and impression management," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 16-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:16-37
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2017.1389988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1389988
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1389988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:16-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.