IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v37y2018i10-11p1021-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the predictive power for anticipating assignment grades in a massive open online course

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos
  • Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino
  • Carlos Alario-Hoyos
  • Iria Estévez-Ayres
  • Carlos Delgado Kloos

Abstract

The learning process in a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) can be improved from knowing in advance learners’ grades on different assignments. This would be very useful to detect problems with enough time to take corrective measures. In this work, the aim is to analyse how different course scores can be predicted, what elements or variables affect the predictions and how much and in which way it is possible to anticipate scores. To do that, data from a MOOC about Java programming have been used. Results show the importance of indicators over the algorithms and that forum-related variables do not add power to predict grades, unlike previous scores. Furthermore, the type of task can vary the results. Regarding the anticipation, it was possible to use data from previous topics but with worse performance, although values were better than those obtained in the first seven days of the current topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos & Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino & Carlos Alario-Hoyos & Iria Estévez-Ayres & Carlos Delgado Kloos, 2018. "Analysing the predictive power for anticipating assignment grades in a massive open online course," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10-11), pages 1021-1036, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:10-11:p:1021-1036
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:37:y:2018:i:10-11:p:1021-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.