IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v36y2017i12p1274-1284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who tends to answer open-ended questions in an e-service survey? The contribution of closed-ended answers

Author

Listed:
  • Ronggang Zhou
  • Xiaorui Wang
  • Leyuan Zhang
  • Haiyan Guo

Abstract

This study presents a web survey investigating the effects of gender, age, prior usage behaviours, and closed-ended answers on response behaviour for open-ended questions in a user satisfaction or experience evaluation. Two types of open-ended questions were measured: general comment-specific questions designed to collect comments and explanation-specific questions designed to determine the reason for a higher or lower score for the closed-ended questions. Using an online structured questionnaire on an e-service telecom website, 13,346 valid responses (73.1% male; all aged 19 or above) were analysed. More than 75% of the respondents did not answer any of the open-ended questions. Although respondents tended to answer comment-specific questions (19.9%) more often than explanation-specific questions (11.9%), personal characteristics emerged as significant predictors of participants’ response behaviour in both types of open-ended questions. Males, younger participants, and those who had more e-service usage behaviours answered more often than other participants. Regarding the relationship between answers in closed-ended and open-ended questions, respondents’ scaled scores were significant predictors of responses to open-ended questions, particularly comment-specific questions. This study suggests that a score of four on a five-point scale may indicate an interesting answer, with negative responses (5.5%) more likely than positive responses (3.9%).

Suggested Citation

  • Ronggang Zhou & Xiaorui Wang & Leyuan Zhang & Haiyan Guo, 2017. "Who tends to answer open-ended questions in an e-service survey? The contribution of closed-ended answers," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 1274-1284, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:12:p:1274-1284
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381165
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:12:p:1274-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.