IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v35y2016i3p184-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using game mechanics for field evaluation of prototype social applications: a novel methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Amon Rapp
  • Federica Cena
  • Cristina Gena
  • Alessandro Marcengo
  • Luca Console

Abstract

This paper describes a novel methodology to evaluate a social media application in its formative phase of design. Taking advantage of the experiences developed in the Alternate Reality Games, we propose to insert game mechanics in the test setting of a formative evaluation of a prototypical social system. As a use case, we present the evaluation of WantEat, a prototypical social mobile application in the gastronomical domain. The evaluation highlighted how the gamification of a field trial can yield good results when evaluating social applications in prototypical status. From a methodological point of view, gamifying a field trial overcomes the cold start problem, caused by the absence of active communities, which can prevent the participation of users and therefore the collection of reliable data. Our experience showed that the gamification of a field evaluation is feasible and can likely increase the quantity of both browsing actions and social actions performed by users. Based on these results, we then are able to provide a set of guidelines to gamify the evaluation session of an interactive system.

Suggested Citation

  • Amon Rapp & Federica Cena & Cristina Gena & Alessandro Marcengo & Luca Console, 2016. "Using game mechanics for field evaluation of prototype social applications: a novel methodology," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 184-195, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:35:y:2016:i:3:p:184-195
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1046931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1046931
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1046931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:35:y:2016:i:3:p:184-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.