IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/specan/v17y2022i3p354-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity spillovers and the productivity–compensation gap

Author

Listed:
  • Shishir Shakya
  • Alicia Plemmons

Abstract

Historically, compensation and productivity steadily trended synchronously with one another. However, since the mid-1970s, these two measures have diverged as productivity increases have outpaced compensation. This divergence is indicative of evidence of wage stagnation and rising income inequality. We provide arguments on the productivity–compensation gap and illuminate possible explanations about whether and why the gap exists in different industries incorporating spatial and trade networks. We confirm that the gap narrows once we account for productivity spillovers between bordering and trading states using spatially lagged X (SLX) models. The results vary across industries and provide insights for policymakers and firms about productivity and compensation patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Shishir Shakya & Alicia Plemmons, 2022. "Productivity spillovers and the productivity–compensation gap," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 354-369, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:354-369
    DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2021.2020889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17421772.2021.2020889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17421772.2021.2020889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:354-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RSEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.