IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sehrxx/v66y2018i3p282-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surprisingly gentle confinement: British treatment of Danish and Norwegian prisoners of war during the napoleonic wars

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Leunig
  • Jelle van Lottum
  • Bo Poulsen

Abstract

The Napoleonic Wars saw the British capture and incarcerate thousands of sailors in disused Royal Navy ships, the so-called prison hulks. Many Danes and Norwegians – navy personnel, privateers and merchant sailors – were thus interred. This article uses a new data source, the official record books kept in the National Archive at Kew, to test whether the prison hulks were as bad as popular perception might suggest. In doing so, we provide the first rigorous quantitative assessment of the Danish and Norwegian sailors’ prisoner experience. We find that death rates were surprisingly low, suggesting the quantity and quality of food and medical care was reasonable. Prison hulks were not ‘floating tombs’. The records also show which prisoners were released and exchanged, and when. Officers did well, reflecting the age old system of a gentleman’s honour. Privateers did worse than merchant sailors: those who took up arms were likely to serve longer as prisoners.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Leunig & Jelle van Lottum & Bo Poulsen, 2018. "Surprisingly gentle confinement: British treatment of Danish and Norwegian prisoners of war during the napoleonic wars," Scandinavian Economic History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 282-297, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sehrxx:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:282-297
    DOI: 10.1080/03585522.2018.1516235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03585522.2018.1516235
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03585522.2018.1516235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sehrxx:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:282-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sehr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.