IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v46y2026i1p59-87.html

Initial Evidence on Stakeholder Participation in EFRAG’s Sustainability Reporting Standard-Setting Process

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Kulik

Abstract

This paper investigates stakeholder participation in the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group’s (EFRAG’s) standard-setting process for sustainability reporting, with a focus on the extent of participation and the level of support across different stakeholder groups and geographical regions. Centred on EFRAG’s development of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), this study analyses participation in the public consultation on the first 13 exposure drafts (EDs). Employing a rational-choice framework and neo-institutional approaches in the analysis of the feedback received from the public consultation, the research tests hypotheses regarding stakeholder behaviours and country-specific differences. The findings highlight significant disparities in participation: preparers demonstrate higher participation frequencies than users, while users express greater support for additional sustainability-related disclosure requirements. Furthermore, support varies among stakeholders with different attributes, such as cultural and institutional backgrounds or simultaneous participation in other sustainability reporting consultations. These results underscore the critical role of stakeholder diversity in fostering input legitimacy and the normativity of the ESRS. By offering early empirical evidence, this paper contributes to emerging literature on sustainability reporting standard-setting and provides valuable insights into the stakeholder dynamics within the European Union (EU) sustainability reporting framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Kulik, 2026. "Initial Evidence on Stakeholder Participation in EFRAG’s Sustainability Reporting Standard-Setting Process," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 59-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:59-87
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2025.2588597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2025.2588597
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2025.2588597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:59-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.