IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v46y2026i1p1-21.html

Digital Technologies, Exploitation, and Accountability: Unveiling the Role of Technology in Modern Slavery Within Kenya's Smallholder Tea Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kizito O. Omukaga

Abstract

This paper explores how digital technologies influence modern slavery in Kenya’s smallholder tea sector by shaping exploitation, concealing abuses, and challenging accountability. Using a qualitative, single-case design, the study engaged 83 participants through interviews and focus groups. Smallholder farmers and former employees were selected via purposive and snowball sampling, and thematic analysis revealed how technology exacerbates labour exploitation in the sector. The findings reveal that modern technologies in Kenya's smallholder tea sector worsen exploitation through mechanisms such as debt bondage, mechanisation, and flawed digital systems. Automated loan deductions and reduced pay for casual workers trap farmers in debt, while digital tools obscure abuse and limit transparency. Weak accountability mechanisms exacerbate workers’ vulnerability, leaving them exposed to ongoing exploitation and financial insecurity. This study highlights how digital technologies, though intended to improve efficiency, can unintentionally conceal or exacerbate modern slavery, providing valuable insights for guiding more equitable tech use and strengthening accountability in vulnerable agricultural economies. The paper addresses a critical gap in empirical research by exploring how digital technologies in Kenya's smallholder tea sector can both obscure and expose modern slavery, advancing our understanding of the intersection between technology, labour exploitation, and accountability in rural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kizito O. Omukaga, 2026. "Digital Technologies, Exploitation, and Accountability: Unveiling the Role of Technology in Modern Slavery Within Kenya's Smallholder Tea Sector," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2025.2566342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2025.2566342
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2025.2566342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.