IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v45y2025i1p14-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Accounting for the Ocean: Utilisation of the Sociology of Worth to Assess Current Practice and Develop Propositions for Holistic Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Perkiss
  • Jordan Gacutan
  • Lee Moerman
  • Rachel Nichols
  • Michelle Voyer
  • Jennifer Atchison
  • Chris Brennan-Horley
  • Shanaka Herath

Abstract

The world’s oceans are vital for planetary health as well as food and energy security. Recently though, they have been increasingly considered as a solution to stagnating economic growth, with ocean resources and ocean spaces being used for both public and private benefit. This puts pressure on the sustainability of ocean ecosystems. These complex challenges have meant a need for an integrated understanding of and a more holistic approach to ocean accounting and governance. We adopt the Sociology of Worth to evaluate the application of the Ocean Accounts framework according to a range of competing and compromising perspectives on the concept of the common good within a contested case study. We find that Ocean Accounts fall short on key social and cultural aspects. However, there is scope to draw on alternative accounts to better inform the use of oceans. While the accounting literature presents a plethora of studies on environmental sustainability, studies on accounting for our ocean are limited. This is the first paper in accounting to focus on the Ocean Accounts framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Perkiss & Jordan Gacutan & Lee Moerman & Rachel Nichols & Michelle Voyer & Jennifer Atchison & Chris Brennan-Horley & Shanaka Herath, 2025. "Exploring Accounting for the Ocean: Utilisation of the Sociology of Worth to Assess Current Practice and Develop Propositions for Holistic Accounting," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 14-41, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:14-41
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2024.2419913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2419913
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2419913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:14-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.