IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v43y2023i3p193-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the SEAJ Ethos: Mentorship and Peer Review

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Apostol
  • Colin Dey
  • Michelle Rodrigue

Abstract

These editorial reflections revisit SEAJ's mentoring ethos, outlining how we embrace it as joint editors. To this end, we mobilize the caretaker analogy, hoping to convey the nurturing position we strive to adopt in our role, which involves valuing each other's intellectual contributions and promoting social and climate justice through the pursuit of transformative quality research and scholarship while proactively responding to issues of inequity and injustice using the levers we have at our disposal. In light of the recent resurfacing of wider concerns over peer review process in scientific publishing, we continue these reflections through considerations of what embracing the SEAJ ethos implies in the peer review process, humbly hoping to recognize and respect the valuable contribution reviewers make to the journal while also developing a community-based perspective on peer review (Souder, 2011).

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Apostol & Colin Dey & Michelle Rodrigue, 2023. "On the SEAJ Ethos: Mentorship and Peer Review," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 193-201, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:43:y:2023:i:3:p:193-201
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2023.2270460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2023.2270460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2023.2270460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:43:y:2023:i:3:p:193-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.