IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v42y2022i1-2p93-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for Carbon Emission Allowances: An Empirical Analysis in the EU ETS Phase 3

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Garcia-Torea
  • Sophie Giordano-Spring
  • Carlos Larrinaga
  • Géraldine Rivière-Giordano

Abstract

This investigation studies the accounting treatment of the carbon emission allowances of EU Emissions Trading System participants to explore whether the auctioning allocation system implemented in 2013 led to changes in accounting practices. This investigation adds to Allini, Giner, and Caldarelli (2018. “Opening the Black Box of Accounting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Different Views of Institutional Bodies and Firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 2195–2205.) by performing a comparative study of how emission allowances are recorded in the 2011 and 2016 financial statements of a large sample of the highest emitters in the system that operate in eight different industries. We also update the analysis of the role of local standards in shaping carbon accounting practices in a context characterised by the lack of IFRS prescription. We found that auctioning did not modify accounting practices as they continue to be ‘messy’ and often absent. The high level of non-disclosure and the prevailing use of the ‘net method’ conceal the burden of allowances from users of financial statements. Additionally, we report that firms’ carbon accounting practices are more aligned with their local standard when it allows a limited representation of the financial impact of allowances. Therefore, current accounting practices are far from enabling an adequate assessment of the financial impact and risks resulting from carbon markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Garcia-Torea & Sophie Giordano-Spring & Carlos Larrinaga & Géraldine Rivière-Giordano, 2022. "Accounting for Carbon Emission Allowances: An Empirical Analysis in the EU ETS Phase 3," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1-2), pages 93-115, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:42:y:2022:i:1-2:p:93-115
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2021.2012496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2021.2012496
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2021.2012496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:42:y:2022:i:1-2:p:93-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.