IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v40y2020i2p116-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Verbal Tone in Mandatory Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from Changes in Disclosures Following SEC Guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Feng
  • Lucia S. Gao

Abstract

This study investigates whether the verbal tone of environmental disclosures in companies’ annual reports changed following SEC interpretive guidance released in 2010. The content analysis software DICTION is used to construct measures of verbal tone and size of the disclosures. For a sample of companies in both environmentally sensitive and non-sensitive industries, we find an increase in the degree of ‘realism’ and ‘certainty’ of the disclosures following the release of the SEC guidance. The results hold after controlling for environmental performance and firm specific characteristics. In addition, the size of environmental disclosures increased in the year preceding the release of the guidance, suggesting that companies may have anticipated an interpretive release from the SEC. Furthermore, there were no significant changes in the size and verbal tone of voluntary environmental disclosures over the same time period, suggesting that the changes in the annual reports filed with the SEC resulted primarily from companies’ responses to the interpretive guidance. These findings show that impressions management is less prevalent in mandated environmental disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Feng & Lucia S. Gao, 2020. "The Verbal Tone in Mandatory Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from Changes in Disclosures Following SEC Guidance," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 116-139, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:40:y:2020:i:2:p:116-139
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2020.1719172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1719172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1719172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:40:y:2020:i:2:p:116-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.