IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v37y2017i3p190-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Corporate Political Donations Disclosure: Lessons from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Shane Leong
  • James Hazelton

Abstract

One of the activities corporations should be accountable for is their level of political donations. This paper examines two mandatory corporate political donation disclosure regimes in Australia and identifies three important lessons. First, our review confirms that although few citizens may care enough to scrutinise donation disclosure, there are people interested in such information and we should take political donation disclosure regimes seriously. Second, a well-funded entity must be made responsible not just for administering the disclosure system, but also for reviewing and recommending updates to the system. One disclosure regime examined in this paper was never updated to reflect the existence of the internet until 2007, because no-one was responsible for monitoring the regime and suggesting necessary updates. Finally, details concerning the ultimate source of donations should be provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Shane Leong & James Hazelton, 2017. "Improving Corporate Political Donations Disclosure: Lessons from Australia," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 190-202, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:190-202
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:190-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.