IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2025y2025i7p659-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal portfolio choice under kinked power utility

Author

Listed:
  • Antoon Pelsser
  • Li Yang

Abstract

We extend the kinked power utility function by allowing a different risk aversion level in the two parts contained in the utility function. We maximize the expected utility of the replacement ratio at retirement that is wealth at retirement to a stochastic benchmark, for plan members in a defined contribution pension plan in a complete market. We derive closed-form optimal solutions under risk aversion and loss aversion implied by the kinked power utility. We find that plan members under kinked power utility tend to de-risk around the reference level, which could lead to a great proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement being on the reference level, while a small variation in the proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement ending up in the left tail. When the reference level is set at 100%, and the market price for future pension premiums (the value of initial capital) is lower than that for the benchmark, a lower risk aversion level when the replacement ratio falls below the reference level, could lead to a significant increase in the proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement being not below the reference level.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoon Pelsser & Li Yang, 2025. "Optimal portfolio choice under kinked power utility," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2025(7), pages 659-679, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2025:y:2025:i:7:p:659-679
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2025.2450387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2025.2450387
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2025.2450387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2025:y:2025:i:7:p:659-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.