IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2023y2023i6p598-623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymptotic analysis of a Stackelberg differential game for insurance under model ambiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Cao
  • Virginia R. Young

Abstract

We consider the problem of to which extent a diffusion process serves as a valid approximation of the classical Cramér-Lundberg (CL) risk process for a Stackelberg differential game between a buyer and a seller of insurance. We show that the equilibrium for the diffusion approximation equals the limit of the equilibrium for the scaled CL process, and it is nearly optimal for the pre-limit problem. Specifically, if the loss process follows a CL risk process and ambiguity is measured via entropic divergence, then the Stackelberg equilibrium of the diffusion approximation with squared-error divergence approximates the equilibrium for the former model to order $ \mathcal {O}\big (\frac {1}{\sqrt {n}}\big ) $ O(1n), in which we scale the CL model via n, as in Cohen and Young [(2020). Rate of convergence of the probability of ruin in the Cramér-Lundberg model to its diffusion approximation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 93: 333–340].

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Cao & Virginia R. Young, 2023. "Asymptotic analysis of a Stackelberg differential game for insurance under model ambiguity," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2023(6), pages 598-623, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2023:y:2023:i:6:p:598-623
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2022.2139632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2022.2139632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2022.2139632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2023:y:2023:i:6:p:598-623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.