IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2022y2022i8p718-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilitarian versus neutralitarian design of endowment fund policies

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes M. Schumacher

Abstract

This paper addresses investment and spending policies of endowment funds aiming to generate a stable income stream in perpetuity. The standard academic approach to the design of such policies is based on optimization of utility aggregated over time. However, the explicit purpose of many funds to serve current and future generations ‘in equal measure’ suggests incorporation of a suitable notion of neutrality. The utilitarian and neutralitarian approaches are compared in two settings: one in which the preferences of individual generations are described by a standard CRRA utility function, and one in which these utility functions are modified by the introduction of a saturation level. Results are expressed in terms of the implied assumed interest rate (AIR), which reflects the apportionment of initially available capital to the time-0 values of individual future benefits. Under CRRA preferences, the neutralitarian point of view can be seen as a way of determining the discount factor that is used in the utilitarian method. When a saturation level is added, the neutralitarian and utilitarian policies are essentially different. The introduction of saturation generally induces a shift of value from earlier to later generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes M. Schumacher, 2022. "Utilitarian versus neutralitarian design of endowment fund policies," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2022(8), pages 718-748, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:8:p:718-748
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2022.2025892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2022.2025892
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2022.2025892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:8:p:718-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.