IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2022y2022i8p695-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling mortality by continuous benefit amount

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen J. Richards

Abstract

Mortality levels vary by benefit amount, and a common simplification is to group by non-overlapping ranges of varying widths. However, this ignores the continuous nature of benefit amounts and leads to discretisation error, i.e. heterogeneity within benefit ranges and step jumps at range boundaries. Another drawback of discretisation is that fitted parameters are not easily extrapolated to values outside the range of the experience data. To address these shortcomings it is often better to model mortality continuously by benefit amount. In this paper we present a method of modelling mortality levels continuously by a financial covariate such as pension size. We split the task into (i) a transform function to address the presence of extreme benefit amounts in actuarial data sets, and (ii) a response function to model mortality. Using as few as two parameters, the method avoids discretisation error and extrapolates to amounts outside the range covered by the calibrating data set. We illustrate the method by applying it to seven international data sets of pensioners and annuitants.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J. Richards, 2022. "Modelling mortality by continuous benefit amount," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2022(8), pages 695-717, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:8:p:695-717
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2022.2025891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2022.2025891
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2022.2025891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:8:p:695-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.