IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2021y2021i6p505-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal contribution rate of PAYGO pension

Author

Listed:
  • Lin He
  • Zongxia Liang
  • Yilun Song
  • Qi Ye

Abstract

In this paper, we study the optimal contribution rate of pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) pension under a Nash equilibrium between the participants and the government. Given the fixed contribution rate, the participants of different cohorts choose optimal consumption and asset allocation policies to achieve their objectives. Using the variational method, we derive the closed-form solution. The value function of the participants is monotonous with respect to the PAYGO contribution rate under constant population growth rate. As such, we modify the ‘Samuelson-Aaron’ criterion that the preference between PAYGO and fully funded pensions depends not only on the demography, investment and salary parameters but also on the age of the cohort. Moreover, we establish the critical age to separate the preference and the ex-post admissible scope for the contribution rate adjustment. As a central planner, the government is fully aware of the participants' optimal feedback functions. The objective of the government is to maximize the overall utility of the participants weighted by each cohort's population. For a shrinking population, the fully funded scheme is more preferable and only the elderly cohorts prefer PAYGO scheme. However, taking into account the larger political power of the elderly cohorts in the objective function, the optimal contribution rate raises slightly.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin He & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song & Qi Ye, 2021. "Optimal contribution rate of PAYGO pension," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2021(6), pages 505-531, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2021:y:2021:i:6:p:505-531
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2020.1858153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2020.1858153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2020.1858153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2021:y:2021:i:6:p:505-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.