IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2020y2020i3p172-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bonus-Malus premiums under the dependent frequency-severity modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Rosy Oh
  • Peng Shi
  • Jae Youn Ahn

Abstract

A Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in insurance is a premium adjustment mechanism widely used in a posteriori ratemaking process to set the premium for the next contract period based on a policyholder's claim history. The current practice in BMS implementation relies on the assumption of independence between claim frequency and severity, despite the fact that a series of recent studies report evidence of a significant frequency-severity relationship, particularly in automobile insurance. To address this discrepancy, we propose a copula-based correlated random effects model to accommodate the dependence between claim frequency and severity, and further illustrate how to incorporate such dependence into the current BMS. We derive analytical solutions to the optimal relativities under the proposed framework and provide numerical experiments based on real data analysis to assess the effect of frequency-severity dependence in BMS ratemaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosy Oh & Peng Shi & Jae Youn Ahn, 2020. "Bonus-Malus premiums under the dependent frequency-severity modeling," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2020(3), pages 172-195, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2020:y:2020:i:3:p:172-195
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2019.1655477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2019.1655477
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2019.1655477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2020:y:2020:i:3:p:172-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.