IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2018y2018i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust reinsurance contracts in continuous time

Author

Listed:
  • Duni Hu
  • Shou Chen
  • Hailong Wang

Abstract

We investigate reinsurance contract problems in a continuous-time principal-agent framework, where the reinsurer (principal) is concerned about potential model ambiguity in the claims process, but the insurer (agent) trusts the claims process, or vice versa. The reinsurer designs a robust reinsurance contract that maximizes his exponential utility of terminal wealth under the worst-case distribution, subject to the insurer’s incentive constraint. Optimal reinsurance contracts are explicitly derived in different ambiguity situations. We first show that the reinsurer’s robustness preference makes him become more conservative, which induces him to raise the reinsurance price, which then decreases the demand for reinsurance. However, the insurer’s robustness preference increases both the reinsurance price and the demand. Furthermore, the reinsurer continuously adjusts the reinsurance price, leading the insurer to always purchase a constant proportion of reinsurance, no matter who faces ambiguity, or whether ambiguity exists. Finally, the economic implications of model ambiguity are illustrated using numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Duni Hu & Shou Chen & Hailong Wang, 2018. "Robust reinsurance contracts in continuous time," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2018:y:2018:i:1:p:1-22
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2016.1274270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2016.1274270
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2016.1274270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2018:y:2018:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.